Ajay Shridhar Patkal vs Maharashtra State Duyyam Nirikshak Rajya Utpadan Shulk Newasa 2 — 69/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAH190004692026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

351/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

69/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shevgaon

Judge

1-The Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Shevgaon

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajay Shridhar Patkal

    Adv. Deshmukh J. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State Duyyam Nirikshak Rajya Utpadan Shulk Newasa 2

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary The court granted the petitioner Ajay Shridhar Patalke's application for release of a seized Hero MotoCorp two-wheeler (FIR No. 329/2025) on a personal bond of Rs. 1,20,000. The court reasoned that prolonged detention would cause deterioration of the vehicle's spare parts and impose financial hardship, and found no evidence that the vehicle would be misused for further crimes, relying on the Supreme Court precedent in Sunderabhai v. Gujarat State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    The Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Shevgaon

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    The Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Shevgaon

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    The Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Shevgaon

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 69/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court granted the petitioner Ajay Shridhar Patalke's application for release of a seized Hero MotoCorp two-wheeler (FIR No. 329/2025) on a personal bond of Rs. 1,20,000. The court reasoned that prolonged detention would cause deterioration of the vehicle's spare parts and impose financial hardship, and found no evidence that the vehicle would be misused for further crimes, relying on the Supreme Court precedent in Sunderabhai v. Gujarat State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case