Mubarak Rajmahammad Beg vs The State Maharashtra Through Shevgaon Po.St. — 67/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAH190004672026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

349/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shevgaon

Judge

3-2Nd Jt.C.J.J.D.J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mubarak Rajmahammad Beg

    Adv. Shaikh Munaf A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Maharashtra Through Shevgaon Po.St.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary The court allowed Mubarak Rajmohmmad Baig's application for interim custody of a seized Mahindra Scorpio vehicle on the grounds that he is the registered owner and prolonged police station storage would deteriorate its value. The applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 7,00,000, not alienate the vehicle until trial conclusion, and produce it as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2Nd Jt.C.J.J.D.J.M.F.C.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2Nd Jt.C.J.J.D.J.M.F.C.

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2Nd Jt.C.J.J.D.J.M.F.C.

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 67/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court allowed Mubarak Rajmohmmad Baig's application for interim custody of a seized Mahindra Scorpio vehicle on the grounds that he is the registered owner and prolonged police station storage would deteriorate its value. The applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 7,00,000, not alienate the vehicle until trial conclusion, and produce it as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case