Rohini Popat Nagargoje vs Popat Ankush Nagargoje Advocate - Mane B. B. — 20/2021
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,15,17,18,19,20,22,26,. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHAH190004102021
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
295/2021
Filing Date
18-03-2021
Registration No
20/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shevgaon
Judge
1-The Jt. Civil Judge JD JMFC Shevgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rohini Popat Nagargoje
Adv. Landepatil L. H.
Arnav Popat Nagargoje
Respondent(s)
Popat Ankush Nagargoje Advocate - Mane B. B.
Ankush Sayaji Nagargoje
Thakubai Ankush Nagargoje
Malhari Ankush Nagargoje
Hearing History
Judge: 1-The Jt. Civil Judge JD JMFC Shevgaon
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 03-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is partially allowed. The court granted interim maintenance of Rs. 1,000 each to petitioner (Respondent No. 1) and Rs. 1,000 to petitioner (Respondent No. 2), totaling Rs. 2,000 as interim relief, payable until the main petition is decided. The court found sufficient prima facie case of domestic violence and directed the respondents to pay this maintenance amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is partially allowed. The court granted interim maintenance of Rs. 1,000 each to petitioner (Respondent No. 1) and Rs. 1,000 to petitioner (Respondent No. 2), totaling Rs. 2,000 as interim relief, payable until the main petition is decided. The court found sufficient prima facie case of domestic violence and directed the respondents to pay this maintenance amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts