Majahar Sultana Sayyad Sadikali vs Vahajoddin Gosmohyaddin Kazi Advocate - Kakade A. V. — 74/2022

Case under Muslim Personal Law (shariat) Application Act Section 15,1,18,19. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH190003592022

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

105/2022

Filing Date

28-02-2022

Registration No

74/2022

Registration Date

02-03-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shevgaon

Judge

3-2ND Jt.C.J.J.D.J.M.F.C.

Acts & Sections

Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act Section 15,1,18,19
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 9,

Petitioner(s)

Majahar Sultana Sayyad Sadikali

Adv. Shelke D. A.

Respondent(s)

Vahajoddin Gosmohyaddin Kazi Advocate - Kakade A. V.

Kazi Mustafa Mohiuddin Nazimuddin

Kazi Ajgar Mohiuddin Naziuddin

Faruki Samrin Majed

Shaikh Farhin Vasim

Siddiki Aafrin Mansurbi

Kazi Hazi Beigam Nazimuddin

Anisa Beigam Ajij Patel

Shamashodabeigam Mukimoddin Siddiki

Nasrin Saddiki Mujib Kazi

Dipali Amol Kakade

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2ND Jt.C.J.J.D.J.M.F.C.

09-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

02-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

19-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

03-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

22-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

17-01-2024
Order on Exhibit

Court Order Summary The application filed by Defendant No. 1 to reject the plaint for undervaluation was partly allowed. The court determined that the suit property (Gat No. 1111) is non-agricultural property (part of Shevgoan Gavthan), not agricultural as claimed by the plaintiff. Consequently, the plaintiff must pay court fees under Section 6(vii) of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act based on the market value within one month; failure to do so will result in plaint rejection under Order VII Rule 11(b) of the CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary The application filed by Defendant No. 1 to reject the plaint for undervaluation was partly allowed. The court determined that the suit property (Gat No. 1111) is non-agricultural property (part of Shevgoan Gavthan), not agricultural as claimed by the plaintiff. Consequently, the plaintiff must pay court fees under Section 6(vii) of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act based on the market value within one month; failure to do so will result in plaint rejection under Order VII Rule 11(b) of the CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shevgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case