Bank of Baroda vs Ramdas Devka Bachkar — 754/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 6. Status: Citation. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH180030482021
Filing Number
866/2021
Filing Date
29-Oct-2021
Registration No
754/2021
Registration Date
29-Oct-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri
Judge
10-Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bank of Baroda
Adv. Kakani M.D.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramdas Devka Bachkar
-
2.Dhula Gangadhar Kawale
Case History
-
23-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Citation
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
25-Mar-2026
Citation
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
20-Mar-2026
Citation
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
09-Mar-2026
Citation
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
14-Feb-2026
Citation
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
06-Feb-2026
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
23-Jan-2026
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
19-Dec-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
27-Nov-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
04-Oct-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
19-Sep-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
07-Aug-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
14-Jul-2025
EvidenceView PDF
Summary In Civil Case No. 754/2021 before the Civil Court at Rahuri, the court allowed the plaintiff Bank of Baroda's petition against defendant Vi-Ramdas Devka Bachkar. The court accepted the affidavit evidence of the bank's witness (branch manager) regarding the loan documents, demand promissory note, mortgage deed, and notices served on the defendant, and rejected the defendant's cross-examination claim of non-service, thereby establishing the bank's case for recovery of the outstanding loan amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Jul-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
28-Apr-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
15-Mar-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
23-Jan-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
12-Dec-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
07-Nov-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
09-Oct-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
12-Aug-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
08-Jul-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
29-Apr-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
04-Apr-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
21-Mar-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
04-Mar-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
04-Jan-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
03-Nov-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
09-Oct-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
28-Aug-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
17-Aug-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
12-Jul-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
30-Apr-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
11-Feb-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
23-Jan-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
12-Nov-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
03-Nov-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
08-Sep-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
05-Aug-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
05-Jul-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
28-Apr-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
21-Mar-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
12-Mar-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
25-Jan-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
13-Dec-2021
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
11-Nov-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Oct-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 754/2021
Summary In Civil Case No. 754/2021 before the Civil Court at Rahuri, the court allowed the plaintiff Bank of Baroda's petition against defendant Vi-Ramdas Devka Bachkar. The court accepted the affidavit evidence of the bank's witness (branch manager) regarding the loan documents, demand promissory note, mortgage deed, and notices served on the defendant, and rejected the defendant's cross-examination claim of non-service, thereby establishing the bank's case for recovery of the outstanding loan amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts