Dadasaheb Rabhaji Sonavane vs Babasaheb Bhausaheb Sonavane Alias Ghansham Alias Babasaheb Rabhaji Sonavane Advocate - NIL — 476/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 36. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH180026282024
e-Filing Number
23-10-2024
Filing Number
559/2024
Filing Date
24-Oct-2024
Registration No
476/2024
Registration Date
24-Oct-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dadasaheb Rabhaji Sonavane
Adv. Kadam S. A.
-
2.Gopinath Rabhaji Sonavane
Adv. Singh Ashish A.
-
3.Manisha Vijay Bhavar
Adv. Singh Ashish A.
-
4.Sunita Anil Pawar
Adv. Singh Ashish A.
-
5.Anita Shrikant Gavde
Adv. Singh Ashish A.
-
6.Suman Rabhaji Sonavane
Adv. Singh Ashish A.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Babasaheb Bhausaheb Sonavane Alias Ghansham Alias Babasaheb Rabhaji Sonavane Advocate - NIL
-
2.Shalan Dada Bhujadi Alias Mathurabai Rabhaji Sonavane
Adv. NIL
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
23-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
09-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
24-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
09-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
07-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
03-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
02-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The application filed by defendants no. 1 and 2 to set aside the "no written statement" (no WS) order has been allowed. The court permitted the defendants to file their written statement on record despite the delay, as the suit involves a perpetual injunction claim where both parties should have an opportunity to be heard on merit. The defendants are required to pay costs of Rs. 300 to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Sep-2025
Compliance
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
04-Aug-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
07-Jul-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
08-Apr-2025
No W.S. Order
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
27-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
12-Feb-2025
W.S. and Say
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
28-Jan-2025
Amended Plaint
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
03-Dec-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
25-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 476/2024
Summary: The application filed by defendants no. 1 and 2 to set aside the "no written statement" (no WS) order has been allowed. The court permitted the defendants to file their written statement on record despite the delay, as the suit involves a perpetual injunction claim where both parties should have an opportunity to be heard on merit. The defendants are required to pay costs of Rs. 300 to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts