Piusha Pravin Londhe vs Pravin Ashok Londhe Advocate - NIL — 102/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1)(i-a). Disposed: Contested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 01st April 2026.
Marriage Petn. - Marriage Petition
CNR: MHAH180025082025
e-Filing Number
21-06-2025
Filing Number
656/2025
Filing Date
27-Jun-2025
Registration No
102/2025
Registration Date
27-Jun-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri
Judge
12-Civil Judge Senior Division
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Piusha Pravin Londhe
Adv. Vishal Ashok Hole
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pravin Ashok Londhe Advocate - NIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court granted the petitioner (wife) a divorce decree under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, finding that the respondent (husband) subjected her to mental cruelty through alcohol abuse, verbal abuse, dowry harassment, and threats to abandon her. The court held that given the husband's persistent cruelty and the petitioner's complete lack of conjugal happiness, divorce was the only viable remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
04-Feb-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
22-Jan-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
05-Jan-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
27-Nov-2025
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
15-Oct-2025
Ex_Party Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
23-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 102/2025
The court granted the petitioner (wife) a divorce decree under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, finding that the respondent (husband) subjected her to mental cruelty through alcohol abuse, verbal abuse, dowry harassment, and threats to abandon her. The court held that given the husband's persistent cruelty and the petitioner's complete lack of conjugal happiness, divorce was the only viable remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts