Karbhari Eknath Dukare vs Babu @ Baburao Vitthal Dukare — 650/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH180024642022

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

749/2022

Filing Date

06-10-2022

Registration No

650/2022

Registration Date

10-10-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,

Petitioner(s)

Karbhari Eknath Dukare

Adv. Khape E. R.3.

Krushna Sunil DukreRepresented by Guardian - Vandana Sunil Dukre

Respondent(s)

Babu @ Baburao Vitthal Dukare

Ganpat Vitthal Dukre

Sunil Baburao Dukre

Arjun Ravsaheb Dukre

Rajendra Raosaheb Dukre

Muralidhar Yashwant Dukre

Sandip Revaji Dukre

Keshav Hari Dukre

Bhagwat Hari Dukre

Zumbarlal Bhagwat Dukre

Govind Bhagwat Dukre

Prashant Dattatray Dukre

Dnyandeo Pandharinath Dukre

Dattatray Pandharinath Dukre

Rajendra Eknath Dukre

Balasaheb Bhausaheb Dukre

Bhaskar Sakharam Dukre

Macchindra Bhausaheb Dukre

Rangnath Raghunath Dukre

Narayan Raghunath Dukre

Sahebrao Raghunath Dukre

Nanasaheb Raghunath Dukre

Somnath Raghunath Dukre

Karbhari Raybhan Dukre

Goraksha Nivrutti Dukre

Gitaram Nivruti Dukre

Rukhmini Baban Raut

Shanta Dinesh Kasar

Vimal Ashok Berad

Nikhil Ashok Dukre

Surekha Ashok Dukre

Priyanka Ajinkya Thete

Rohini Sachin Yeole

Jagannath Krushnaji Dukre

Popat Krushnaji Dukre

Balasaheb Surybhan Dukre

Arjun Suryabhan Dukre

Sarjerav Suryabhan Dukre

Bapusaheb Laxman Dukre

Sopan Laxman Dukre

Navnath Laxman Dukre

Shankar Bhausaheb Dukre

Nanasaheb Sitaram Dukre

Dattatray Sitaram Dukre

Bapu Sakharam Dukre

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

09-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

19-01-2026

Compliance

19-11-2025

Compliance

24-09-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-07-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

19-11-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed defendants 9-14's application for condonation of 35 days' delay in filing their written statement, subject to costs of Rs. 300/- payable to the plaintiff. The delay was condoned in the interest of justice to uphold natural justice principles, as the written statement is necessary for deciding the suit on merit. The written statement of defendants 9-14 is now taken on record upon compliance with this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed defendants 9-14's application for condonation of 35 days' delay in filing their written statement, subject to costs of Rs. 300/- payable to the plaintiff. The delay was condoned in the interest of justice to uphold natural justice principles, as the written statement is necessary for deciding the suit on merit. The written statement of defendants 9-14 is now taken on record upon compliance with this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case