State Excise Sangamner-1 vs Akash Balasaheb Pandit — 1156/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH180023092024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-09-2024

Filing Number

1838/2024

Filing Date

18-09-2024

Registration No

1156/2024

Registration Date

19-09-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

Police Station

RAHURI POLICE STATION

Year

0

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

State Excise Sangamner-1

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Akash Balasaheb Pandit

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

09-03-2026

Disposed

09-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

18-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

18-07-2025

Awaiting Summons

18-06-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court disposed of the case against Akash Balasaheb Pandit under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagari Suraksha Sanhita 2023 and discharged him from the accusation of violating Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found sufficient grounds for dismissal due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite a non-bailable warrant and the charge sheet being filed without a medical examination report. Seized liquor (360 liters total) was directed to the Ahmednagar excise department for disposal after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the case against Akash Balasaheb Pandit under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagari Suraksha Sanhita 2023 and discharged him from the accusation of violating Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found sufficient grounds for dismissal due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite a non-bailable warrant and the charge sheet being filed without a medical examination report. Seized liquor (360 liters total) was directed to the Ahmednagar excise department for disposal after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case