Maruti Bhagwan Tarde vs Suman Bhausaheb Jadhav Advocate - Kadam S. A. — 531/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH180023072021
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
605/2021
Filing Date
12-08-2021
Registration No
531/2021
Registration Date
13-08-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri
Judge
12-Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maruti Bhagwan Tarde
Adv. Kobarne V. G.
Vishnu Bhagwan Tarde
Adv. Kobarne V. G.
Bhagwan Shaharam Tarde
Adv. Kobarne V. G.
Sunita Bhagwan Tarde
Adv. Kobarne V. G.
Respondent(s)
Suman Bhausaheb Jadhav Advocate - Kadam S. A.
Sandip Bhausaheb Jadhav
Adv. Kadam S. A.
Dattatray Bhausaheb Jadhav
Adv. Kadam S. A.
Rohini Bhausaheb Jadhav
Adv. Kadam S. A.
Pallavi Ravindra Nagode
Adv. Kadam S. A.
Annasaheb Keru Jadhav
Adv. Kadam S. A.
Kamal Sitaram Kadam
Adv. Kadam S. A.
Chandrakala Nanasaheb Nikam
Adv. Kadam S. A.
Manda Shivaji Sinare
Adv. Kadam S. A.
Mathurabai Keru Jadhav
Adv. Kadam S. A.
Sushila Jagnnath Tarde
Adv. NIL
Anil Jagnnath Tarde
Adv. NIL
Nivrutti Dhondiram Tarde
Adv. NIL
Dnyandeo Dhondiram Tarde
Adv. NIL
Jaywant Dhondiram Tarde
Adv. NIL
Bhausaheb Dhondiram Tarde
Adv. NIL
Dattatray Ananda Tarde
Adv. NIL
Sunil Sopan Jagdale
Adv. Kadam S. A.
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Civil Judge Senior Division
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 11-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Maruti v. Suman (R.C.S. No. 531/2021), the Civil Judge allowed the plaintiffs' application to produce documents on record. The court held that document production would aid in establishing a prima facie case and would not prejudice the defendants, as production does not constitute admission of evidence. The parties were directed to proceed expeditiously with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Maruti v. Suman (R.C.S. No. 531/2021), the Civil Judge allowed the plaintiffs' application to produce documents on record. The court held that document production would aid in establishing a prima facie case and would not prejudice the defendants, as production does not constitute admission of evidence. The parties were directed to proceed expeditiously with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts