Maruti Bhagwan Tarde vs Suman Bhausaheb Jadhav Advocate - Kadam S. A. — 531/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 20-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH180023072021

Filing Number

605/2021

Filing Date

12-Aug-2021

Registration No

531/2021

Registration Date

13-Aug-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri

Judge

12-Civil Judge Senior Division

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maruti Bhagwan Tarde

    Adv. Kobarne V. G.

  2. 2.Vishnu Bhagwan Tarde

    Adv. Kobarne V. G.

  3. 3.Bhagwan Shaharam Tarde

    Adv. Kobarne V. G.

  4. 4.Sunita Bhagwan Tarde

    Adv. Kobarne V. G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suman Bhausaheb Jadhav Advocate - Kadam S. A.

  2. 2.Sandip Bhausaheb Jadhav

    Adv. Kadam S. A.

  3. 3.Dattatray Bhausaheb Jadhav

    Adv. Kadam S. A.

  4. 4.Rohini Bhausaheb Jadhav

    Adv. Kadam S. A.

  5. 5.Pallavi Ravindra Nagode

    Adv. Kadam S. A.

  6. 6.Annasaheb Keru Jadhav

    Adv. Kadam S. A.

  7. 7.Kamal Sitaram Kadam

    Adv. Kadam S. A.

  8. 8.Chandrakala Nanasaheb Nikam

    Adv. Kadam S. A.

  9. 9.Manda Shivaji Sinare

    Adv. Kadam S. A.

  10. 10.Mathurabai Keru Jadhav

    Adv. Kadam S. A.

  11. 11.Sushila Jagnnath Tarde

    Adv. NIL

  12. 12.Anil Jagnnath Tarde

    Adv. NIL

  13. 13.Nivrutti Dhondiram Tarde

    Adv. NIL

  14. 14.Dnyandeo Dhondiram Tarde

    Adv. NIL

  15. 15.Jaywant Dhondiram Tarde

    Adv. NIL

  16. 16.Bhausaheb Dhondiram Tarde

    Adv. NIL

  17. 17.Dattatray Ananda Tarde

    Adv. NIL

  18. 18.Sunil Sopan Jagdale

    Adv. Kadam S. A.

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  5. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  7. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  8. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  9. 15-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  10. 15-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  11. 15-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: In Maruti v. Suman (R.C.S. No. 531/2021), the Civil Judge allowed the plaintiffs' application to produce documents on record. The court held that document production would aid in establishing a prima facie case and would not prejudice the defendants, as production does not constitute admission of evidence. The parties were directed to proceed expeditiously with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  13. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  14. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  15. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  16. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  17. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  18. 10-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  19. 23-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  20. 12-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  21. 21-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  22. 27-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  23. 19-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  24. 13-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  25. 18-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  26. 24-Aug-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  27. 28-Jun-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  28. 25-Apr-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  29. 08-Mar-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  30. 01-Feb-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  31. 17-Jan-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  32. 16-Nov-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  33. 20-Sep-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  34. 16-Aug-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  35. 14-Jul-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  36. 14-Jun-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  37. 07-May-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  38. 19-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  39. 04-Mar-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  40. 20-Jan-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  41. 17-Dec-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  42. 17-Nov-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  43. 29-Oct-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  44. 29-Sep-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  45. 20-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 12-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 531/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Maruti v. Suman (R.C.S. No. 531/2021), the Civil Judge allowed the plaintiffs' application to produce documents on record. The court held that document production would aid in establishing a prima facie case and would not prejudice the defendants, as production does not constitute admission of evidence. The parties were directed to proceed expeditiously with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case