Chhyabai Bansi Gujar Alias Chhya Balu Dhawale vs Navnath Bansi Gujar Advocate - dhokane k. n. — 114/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH180006312024

e-Filing Number

12-03-2024

Filing Number

129/2024

Filing Date

13-Mar-2024

Registration No

114/2024

Registration Date

16-Mar-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri

Judge

10-Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,38

Petitioner(s)

1.Chhyabai Bansi Gujar Alias Chhya Balu Dhawale

Adv. Raut J. M

Respondent(s)

1.Navnath Bansi Gujar Advocate - dhokane k. n.
2.Shree Swami Samarth Agro Industries Pro Pro Ramdas Annasaheb Khemnar

Case History

16-Jun-2026

Next hearingPending
13-Apr-2026

Evidence

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
09-Mar-2026

Evidence

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
06-Feb-2026

Evidence

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
03-Jan-2026

Evidence

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
04-Nov-2025

Steps_Unready

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
20-Aug-2025

Steps_Unready

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
25-Jun-2025

Steps_Unready

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
25-Apr-2025

Steps_Unready

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
15-Mar-2025

Steps_Unready

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
04-Mar-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Summary: The Civil Judge Junior Division, Rahuri, allowed the application filed by defendant no.1 for condonation of delay in filing the written statement. The court found that the defendant's delay was justified due to unavailability of documents and necessary information, and that allowing the application would not prejudice the plaintiff. The defendant is required to pay costs of Rs.500/- to the plaintiff as compensation for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
04-Mar-2025

Depositing Amount

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
07-Feb-2025

Ex_Party Hearing

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
18-Dec-2024

Ex_Party Hearing

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
18-Oct-2024

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
18-Sep-2024

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
28-Aug-2024

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
26-Jul-2024

W.S. and Say

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
15-Jun-2024

W.S. and Say

Jt Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
25-Apr-2024

W.S. and Say

Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
19-Mar-2024

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
13-Mar-2024

Case filed

Registration No. 114/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Civil Judge Junior Division, Rahuri, allowed the application filed by defendant no.1 for condonation of delay in filing the written statement. The court found that the defendant's delay was justified due to unavailability of documents and necessary information, and that allowing the application would not prejudice the plaintiff. The defendant is required to pay costs of Rs.500/- to the plaintiff as compensation for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.