Pandharinath Shankar Shirsath vs Satish Shankar Shirsath — 154/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39,. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH180006282023
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
15-03-2023
Filing Number
187/2023
Filing Date
15-03-2023
Registration No
154/2023
Registration Date
16-03-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandharinath Shankar Shirsath
Adv. Nagle J. V.
Respondent(s)
Satish Shankar Shirsath
Bhagwan Rabhaji Shirsath
Shivaji Rabhaji Shirsath
Babai Rabhaji Shirsath
Harish Rabhaji Shirsath
Ramesh Mahadu Shirsath
Devidas Mahadu Shirsath
Sunil Mahadu Shirsath
Bhagubai Mahadu Shirsath
Amol Prabhakar Shirsath
Adv. Ghogre S. B.
Bhausaheb Salba Shirsath
Aashabai Bhausaheb Shirsath
Priti Babasaheb Shirsath
Balasaheb Bhausaheb Shirsath
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a civil property dispute case (R.M. No. 154/2023) between Pandharinath Shankar Shirsath and Satish Shankar Shirsath heard in the Civil Court at Rahuri. The court order dated 02.02.2026, signed by Judge P. H. Patil, addresses four issues regarding property ownership, encroachment by defendant No. 10, and entitlement to possession of the encroached area. The specific judgment outcome is not fully legible in the provided document pages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil property dispute case (R.M. No. 154/2023) between Pandharinath Shankar Shirsath and Satish Shankar Shirsath heard in the Civil Court at Rahuri. The court order dated 02.02.2026, signed by Judge P. H. Patil, addresses four issues regarding property ownership, encroachment by defendant No. 10, and entitlement to possession of the encroached area. The specific judgment outcome is not fully legible in the provided document pages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts