Mahesh Yashwant Sathe vs Forest Circle Officer — 32/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAH180004962026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
339/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
32/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mahesh Yashwant Sathe
Adv. DHANWADE PRADIP ARJUN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Forest Circle Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
The court rejected Mahesh Yashwant Sathe's application for return of his seized vehicle, holding that once the Forest Officer initiates confiscation proceedings under the Indian Forest Act 1987, the magistrate's jurisdiction is barred and cannot order release of the vehicle. The court found it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application due to statutory bars under sections 52(c) and 52(d) of the Indian Forest Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
30-Mar-2026
Compliance
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
23-Mar-2026
Compliance
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
12-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
09-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
04-Mar-2026
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
26-Feb-2026
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 32/2026
The court rejected Mahesh Yashwant Sathe's application for return of his seized vehicle, holding that once the Forest Officer initiates confiscation proceedings under the Indian Forest Act 1987, the magistrate's jurisdiction is barred and cannot order release of the vehicle. The court found it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application due to statutory bars under sections 52(c) and 52(d) of the Indian Forest Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts