Jayashri Vijay Aavhad vs Vijay Rakhama Avhad — 9/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 494,109,34. Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH180000452024
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
04-01-2024
Filing Number
41/2024
Filing Date
04-01-2024
Registration No
9/2024
Registration Date
04-01-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri
Judge
11-3rd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jayashri Vijay Aavhad
Adv. Bachkar B. S.
Respondent(s)
Vijay Rakhama Avhad
Varsha Vijay Avhad Alias Varsha Macchindra Sathe
Rakhma Bansi Avhad
Hirabai Rakhma Avhad
Sunita Rakhma Avhad
Sangita Anil Solase
Anil Sahebrao Solase
Anita Chandrakant Wakchoure
Chandrakant Bhau Wakchoure
Macchindra Alias Kalu Appa Sathe
Chaya Macchindra Sathe
Raosaheb Laxman Tribhuvan
Abasaheb Nivrutti Shelar
Hearing History
Judge: 11-3rd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 27-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 22-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 28-10-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The court issued summons against accused Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, and 11 for committing bigamy (IPC Section 494 read with Section 34), finding prima facie evidence that the husband solemnized a second marriage during the subsistence of his first marriage with the complainant, with the knowledge and participation of the other accused. The complaint was dismissed against accused Nos. 5-9, 12, and 13 due to lack of sufficient evidence of their involvement in the offense. The case is returnable on 09/01/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The court issued summons against accused Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, and 11 for committing bigamy (IPC Section 494 read with Section 34), finding prima facie evidence that the husband solemnized a second marriage during the subsistence of his first marriage with the complainant, with the knowledge and participation of the other accused. The complaint was dismissed against accused Nos. 5-9, 12, and 13 due to lack of sufficient evidence of their involvement in the offense. The case is returnable on 09/01/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts