Jayashri Vijay Aavhad vs Vijay Rakhama Avhad — 9/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 494,109,34. Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH180000452024

N.B.W._Unready

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

04-01-2024

Filing Number

41/2024

Filing Date

04-01-2024

Registration No

9/2024

Registration Date

04-01-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri

Judge

11-3rd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 494,109,34

Petitioner(s)

Jayashri Vijay Aavhad

Adv. Bachkar B. S.

Respondent(s)

Vijay Rakhama Avhad

Varsha Vijay Avhad Alias Varsha Macchindra Sathe

Rakhma Bansi Avhad

Hirabai Rakhma Avhad

Sunita Rakhma Avhad

Sangita Anil Solase

Anil Sahebrao Solase

Anita Chandrakant Wakchoure

Chandrakant Bhau Wakchoure

Macchindra Alias Kalu Appa Sathe

Chaya Macchindra Sathe

Raosaheb Laxman Tribhuvan

Abasaheb Nivrutti Shelar

Hearing History

Judge: 11-3rd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC

09-04-2026

N.B.W._Unready

09-03-2026

N.B.W._Unready

27-01-2026

N.B.W._Unready

22-01-2026

N.B.W._Unready

28-10-2025

N.B.W._Unready

Interim Orders

06-11-2024
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY The court issued summons against accused Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, and 11 for committing bigamy (IPC Section 494 read with Section 34), finding prima facie evidence that the husband solemnized a second marriage during the subsistence of his first marriage with the complainant, with the knowledge and participation of the other accused. The complaint was dismissed against accused Nos. 5-9, 12, and 13 due to lack of sufficient evidence of their involvement in the offense. The case is returnable on 09/01/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court issued summons against accused Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, and 11 for committing bigamy (IPC Section 494 read with Section 34), finding prima facie evidence that the husband solemnized a second marriage during the subsistence of his first marriage with the complainant, with the knowledge and participation of the other accused. The complaint was dismissed against accused Nos. 5-9, 12, and 13 due to lack of sufficient evidence of their involvement in the offense. The case is returnable on 09/01/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case