HDFC Bank Ltd vs Balasaheb Vishwanath Bale — 83/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21R(5)(11). Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

Arbitration R.D

CNR: MHAH170043162025

e-Filing Number

29-08-2025

Filing Number

1078/2025

Filing Date

29-Aug-2025

Registration No

83/2025

Registration Date

28-Oct-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahata

Judge

1-2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21R(5)(11)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDFC Bank Ltd

    Adv. Wagh Sachin B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balasaheb Vishwanath Bale

  2. 2.Swati Balasaheb Bale

  3. 3.Balkrushna Ramdas Rakte

  4. 4.Ashok Shravan Madake

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The Lok Adalat at Rahata passed an award in the dispute between HDFC Bank Ltd and Balasaheb Vishwanath Bale, Swati Balasaheb Bale, and Balkrushna Ramdas Rakte after the parties compromised and settled the matter. The specific settlement terms were recorded, and any court fees paid by either party shall be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  4. 08-May-2026

    Compromise

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  8. 03-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 29-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 83/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalat at Rahata passed an award in the dispute between HDFC Bank Ltd and Balasaheb Vishwanath Bale, Swati Balasaheb Bale, and Balkrushna Ramdas Rakte after the parties compromised and settled the matter. The specific settlement terms were recorded, and any court fees paid by either party shall be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case