Yashwant Tatya Nale vs Venunath Santu Mule — 298/2017
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH170038892017
Filing Number
440/2017
Filing Date
12-Oct-2017
Registration No
298/2017
Registration Date
12-Oct-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahata
Judge
1-2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
Decision Date
04-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Yashwant Tatya Nale
Adv. Pulate B. L.
-
2.Arjun Tatya Nale
Adv. Pulate B. L.
-
3.Harishchandra Tatya Nale
Adv. Pulate B. L.
-
4.Sopan Tatya Nale
Adv. Pulate B. L.
-
5.Ramchandra Tatya nale
Adv. Pulate B. L.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Venunath Santu Mule
-
2.Raju Venunath Mule
-
3.Vijay Venunath Mule
-
4.Bhausaheb Rangnath Nale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2026
Copy of Judgment
Case Summary: 298/2017 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petitioners' suit with costs on April 4, 2026. The petitioners sought a declaratory judgment that they have the exclusive right to use a specific agricultural road across the respondents' land to access their own property (Plot 1039). Although a prior road case (27/2011) had granted them a right-of-way, the court found the current suit lacked necessary parties—other co-owners of the respondent's property were not joined—creating a defect in jurisdiction. Additionally, the court noted the petitioners approached with unclean hands, as they had not sought injunctive relief despite respondents' threats to destroy the road. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
01-Apr-2026
Judgment
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgment
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgment
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
07-Feb-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
23-Jan-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
17-Jan-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
07-Jan-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
16-Sep-2025
Order on Exhibit
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
09-Jul-2025
Steps
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
23-Apr-2025
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
07-Mar-2025
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
13-Feb-2025
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
18-Dec-2024
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
06-Nov-2024
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
28-Sep-2024
Compromise
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
14-Sep-2024
Compromise
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
27-Jul-2024
Compromise
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
14-Jun-2024
Compromise
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
03-Apr-2024
Compromise
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
12-Feb-2024
Compromise
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
18-Dec-2023
Compromise
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
30-Nov-2023
Compromise
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
18-Oct-2023
Compromise
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
09-Oct-2023
Compromise
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
09-Sep-2023
Compromise
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
06-Sep-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
17-Aug-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
28-Jun-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
29-Apr-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
03-Mar-2023
Report
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
10-Jan-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
06-Dec-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
11-Oct-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
13-Aug-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
12-Aug-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
18-Jun-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
21-Mar-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
25-Jan-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
06-Dec-2021
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
12-Oct-2021
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
17-Aug-2021
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
25-Jun-2021
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
30-Mar-2021
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
02-Feb-2021
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
24-Nov-2020
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
29-Aug-2020
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
30-Jun-2020
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
12-Jun-2020
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
20-Mar-2020
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
17-Feb-2020
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
18-Dec-2019
Steps
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
15-Oct-2019
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
29-Aug-2019
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
12-Jul-2019
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
25-Mar-2019
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
26-Feb-2019
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
23-Jan-2019
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
17-Dec-2018
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
19-Sep-2018
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
21-Jun-2018
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
04-May-2018
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D.and JMFC
-
19-Mar-2018
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D.and JMFC
-
16-Feb-2018
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D.and JMFC
-
20-Dec-2017
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D.and JMFC
-
21-Nov-2017
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D.and JMFC
-
27-Oct-2017
Unready Board
Civil Judge J.D.and JMFC
-
13-Oct-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Oct-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 298/2017
Case Summary: 298/2017 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petitioners' suit with costs on April 4, 2026. The petitioners sought a declaratory judgment that they have the exclusive right to use a specific agricultural road across the respondents' land to access their own property (Plot 1039). Although a prior road case (27/2011) had granted them a right-of-way, the court found the current suit lacked necessary parties—other co-owners of the respondent's property were not joined—creating a defect in jurisdiction. Additionally, the court noted the petitioners approached with unclean hands, as they had not sought injunctive relief despite respondents' threats to destroy the road. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts