State through Loni Police Station vs Tushar Vilas Kharde Advocate - Vikhe N. B. — 2738/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHAH170036892016
Filing Number
3300/2016
Filing Date
17-Sep-2016
Registration No
2738/2016
Registration Date
17-Sep-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahata
Judge
5-2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
Decision Date
25-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
I 110
Police Station
Loni Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State through Loni Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tushar Vilas Kharde Advocate - Vikhe N. B.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Tushar Vilas Kharde (2738/2016) Court Decision: The accused Tushar Vilas Kharde is acquitted of all charges and discharged from the case. Key Reasoning: The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence. While the case involved a motor vehicle accident on August 5, 2016, where a motorcycle collided with an Indigo car, allegedly causing serious injuries to two persons, the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that: (1) all eyewitnesses identified the accused based on hearsay information rather than direct observation, (2) no witness independently confirmed the accused's identity or that he was driving the vehicle, (3) crucial procedural evidence including proper documentation of the seized vehicles was missing, and (4) medical evidence was presented only through identity rather than substantive expert testimony. The delayed FIR filing and inconsistencies in witness statements further weakened the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-May-2026
Disposed
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
19-May-2026
Arguments
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
05-May-2026
Arguments
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
10-Feb-2026
Arguments
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
16-Dec-2025
Arguments
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
14-Oct-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
22-Sep-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
22-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
22-Sep-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
18-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
04-Aug-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
21-Jul-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
21-Jul-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
16-Jun-2025
N.B.W._Ready
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
03-Dec-2024
Order on Exh
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
11-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
05-Nov-2024
Arguments
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
14-Oct-2024
Arguments
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
26-Sep-2024
EvidenceView PDF
-
26-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
30-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
15-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
16-Mar-2024
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
29-Jan-2024
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
14-Dec-2023
N.B.W._Ready
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
05-Dec-2023
N.B.W._Ready
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
28-Nov-2023
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
21-Nov-2023
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
02-Nov-2023
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-Oct-2023
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
27-Sep-2023
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
01-Sep-2023
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
05-Aug-2023
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
15-Jul-2023
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
12-Jun-2023
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
22-May-2023
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
02-May-2023
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
01-Apr-2023
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
18-Mar-2023
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-Feb-2023
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
21-Jan-2023
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
19-Dec-2022
Evidence Part Heard
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
19-Oct-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
30-Sep-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
11-Aug-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
11-Jul-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
14-Jun-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
30-Apr-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
25-Apr-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
05-Apr-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
19-Mar-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
08-Mar-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
04-Mar-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
02-Mar-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
24-Feb-2022
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
08-Dec-2021
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
23-Oct-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
28-Aug-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
22-Apr-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
26-Mar-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
22-Mar-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
08-Mar-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
08-Dec-2020
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
21-Nov-2020
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
22-Oct-2020
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
21-Sep-2020
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-Jul-2020
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
16-Jun-2020
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
13-May-2020
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
30-Mar-2020
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
13-Mar-2020
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
07-Feb-2020
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
08-Jan-2020
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
04-Dec-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
12-Nov-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
09-Oct-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
10-Sep-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
26-Aug-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
01-Aug-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
20-Jul-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
06-Jul-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
26-Jun-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
19-Jun-2019
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
19-Jun-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-May-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
07-May-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
16-Apr-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
02-Apr-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
11-Mar-2019
Awaiting Warrant
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
06-Mar-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
05-Feb-2019
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
19-Jan-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
04-Jan-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
29-Nov-2018
Hearing
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
19-Oct-2018
Hearing
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
15-Sep-2018
Hearing
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-Aug-2018
Hearing
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
06-Aug-2018
Hearing
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
09-Jul-2018
Awaiting Warrant
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
05-Jun-2018
Hearing
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
14-Mar-2018
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
19-Jan-2018
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
24-Nov-2017
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
26-Sep-2017
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
29-Jul-2017
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
27-Jun-2017
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
05-Apr-2017
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
03-Feb-2017
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
03-Dec-2016
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
17-Sep-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Sep-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 2738/2016
Case Summary: State v. Tushar Vilas Kharde (2738/2016) Court Decision: The accused Tushar Vilas Kharde is acquitted of all charges and discharged from the case. Key Reasoning: The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence. While the case involved a motor vehicle accident on August 5, 2016, where a motorcycle collided with an Indigo car, allegedly causing serious injuries to two persons, the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that: (1) all eyewitnesses identified the accused based on hearsay information rather than direct observation, (2) no witness independently confirmed the accused's identity or that he was driving the vehicle, (3) crucial procedural evidence including proper documentation of the seized vehicles was missing, and (4) medical evidence was presented only through identity rather than substantive expert testimony. The delayed FIR filing and inconsistencies in witness statements further weakened the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts