Jugnu Sadik Pathan vs Mahesh Narayan Kote — 55/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34 and 38. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHAH170033282025
e-Filing Number
05-08-2025
Filing Number
819/2025
Filing Date
12-Aug-2025
Registration No
55/2025
Registration Date
12-Aug-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahata
Judge
1-2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jugnu Sadik Pathan
Adv. Mandal Rupa R.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahesh Narayan Kote
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case 55/2025 Summary: Defendant Mahesh Narayan Kote's application to set aside a "no cross" order was allowed with costs. The court permitted the defendant to cross-examine the plaintiff in this specific performance and perpetual injunction suit, provided the defendant pays Rs. 500 as costs to the plaintiff. The court found the defendant's excuse about not receiving the affidavit copy invalid but granted the opportunity in the interest of deciding the suit on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Compliance
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
04-May-2026
Evidence
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
Issues
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
12-Jan-2026
Issues
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
18-Dec-2025
Order on Exhibit
-
18-Dec-2025
Order on Exhibit
-
18-Dec-2025
Compliance
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
12-Dec-2025
Hearing
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
04-Oct-2025
Evidence
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
29-Sep-2025
Ex-Parte Order
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
08-Sep-2025
Ex-Parte Order
2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM
-
14-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 55/2025
Case 55/2025 Summary: Defendant Mahesh Narayan Kote's application to set aside a "no cross" order was allowed with costs. The court permitted the defendant to cross-examine the plaintiff in this specific performance and perpetual injunction suit, provided the defendant pays Rs. 500 as costs to the plaintiff. The court found the defendant's excuse about not receiving the affidavit copy invalid but granted the opportunity in the interest of deciding the suit on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts