Suresh Prabhakar Lokhande vs Shaikh Shakil Abdul Gani — 388/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Ready Next hearing 21-Jul-2026

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH170031272025

e-Filing Number

15-07-2025

Filing Number

784/2025

Filing Date

28-Jul-2025

Registration No

388/2025

Registration Date

28-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahata

Judge

1-2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,37,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Prabhakar Lokhande

    Adv. Shirsath N. Y.

  2. 2.Eknath Prabhakar Lokhande

    Adv. Shirsath N. Y.

  3. 3.Chandrabhan Prabhakar Lokhande

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  4. 4.Ashabai Champalal Lokhande

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  5. 5.Vishal Champalal Lokhande

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  6. 6.Siddharth Champalal Lokhande

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  7. 7.Jayshree Ruthraj Gabriyal

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  8. 8.Archana Sandip Kadam

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  9. 9.Soniya Kishor Bagul

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  10. 10.Kusum Rajendra Kadam

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  11. 11.Kunda Sanjay Waghmare

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  12. 12.Ranjana Vijay Tambe

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  13. 13.Sandip Padmakar Lokhande

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  14. 14.Vijay Padmakar Lokhande

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  15. 15.Bebibai Rohidas Lokhande

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  16. 16.Shivaji Rohidas Lokhande

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  17. 17.Shaila Bhimraj Mokal

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

  18. 18.Mangal Vijay Tapale

    Adv. SHIRSATH NAMDEO YAMAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shaikh Shakil Abdul Gani

  2. 2.Vaijanti Dilip Jagtap

  3. 3.Pankaj Dhansukhlal Raka

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS No. 388/2025 Defendant No.3's application to set aside the "no written statement" order was allowed. The court found the defendant's illness claim lacked supporting documentation but permitted him to file a written statement in the suit for declaration, recovery of possession, and perpetual injunction. The defendant must pay Rs. 500 costs to the plaintiff before filing the written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  10. 01-Nov-2025

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  11. 19-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt Cjsd and Addl CJM

  12. 30-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 28-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 388/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 388/2025 Defendant No.3's application to set aside the "no written statement" order was allowed. The court found the defendant's illness claim lacked supporting documentation but permitted him to file a written statement in the suit for declaration, recovery of possession, and perpetual injunction. The defendant must pay Rs. 500 costs to the plaintiff before filing the written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case