Ramesh Vishvanath Autade vs Avinash Vinod Suryvanshi — 289/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,34. Status: Report. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Report Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHAH170031262023

e-Filing Number

29-08-2023

Filing Number

2283/2023

Filing Date

01-Sep-2023

Registration No

289/2023

Registration Date

01-Sep-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahata

Judge

8-Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Vishvanath Autade

    Adv. Korade Y. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Avinash Vinod Suryvanshi

  2. 2.Aashutosh Vinod Suryvanshi

  3. 3.Puja Avinash Suryvanshi

  4. 4.Vinod Pandit Suryvanshi

  5. 5.Sunanda Vinod Suryvanshi

  6. 6.Vaishali Aasutosh Autade

  7. 7.Esha Ram Bishan Jaysval

  8. 8.Ratnesh Varma

  9. 9.Harshal Chhagnrao Jthar

  10. 10.Santosh Sahadu Bedade

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  5. 26-Nov-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  6. 10-Oct-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  7. 18-Aug-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  8. 02-Jul-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  9. 19-May-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  10. 29-Mar-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  11. 03-Feb-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  12. 06-Jan-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  13. 14-Nov-2024

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  14. 01-Oct-2024

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  15. 04-Sep-2024

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  16. 26-Jul-2024

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  17. 21-Jun-2024

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  18. 22-Apr-2024

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  19. 08-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  20. 19-Mar-2024

    Verification

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  21. 03-Feb-2024

    Verification

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  22. 09-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Cri.MA No.289/2023 Ramesh Vishvanath Autade filed a complaint seeking FIR registration against 10 accused persons for cheating and misappropriation under IPC sections 420 and 406. Autade alleged he invested Rs. 1,20,00,000 with the accused (share broking company directors) on promises of doubling returns, but received only Rs. 35,78,429, with Rs. 84,21,571 remaining unpaid despite false affidavits and refund agreements. The court rejected the prayer for FIR registration and police investigation, finding the transaction was contractual in nature between broker and customer, not a criminal matter. Instead, the court ordered the case be placed for verification of the complainant under section 200 CrPC, allowing for civil remedy through appropriate channels rather than criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 09-Jan-2024

    Verification

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  24. 08-Jan-2024

    Order

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  25. 29-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  26. 31-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  27. 05-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC

  28. 01-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 01-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 289/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri.MA No.289/2023 Ramesh Vishvanath Autade filed a complaint seeking FIR registration against 10 accused persons for cheating and misappropriation under IPC sections 420 and 406. Autade alleged he invested Rs. 1,20,00,000 with the accused (share broking company directors) on promises of doubling returns, but received only Rs. 35,78,429, with Rs. 84,21,571 remaining unpaid despite false affidavits and refund agreements. The court rejected the prayer for FIR registration and police investigation, finding the transaction was contractual in nature between broker and customer, not a criminal matter. Instead, the court ordered the case be placed for verification of the complainant under section 200 CrPC, allowing for civil remedy through appropriate channels rather than criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case