State through Loni Police Station vs Ravindra Ramdas Sonawane — 847/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304(a),279,337,338,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHAH170020552021
Filing Number
1583/2021
Filing Date
27-Jul-2021
Registration No
847/2021
Registration Date
27-Jul-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahata
Judge
2-3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
241
Police Station
Loni Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State through Loni Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ravindra Ramdas Sonawane
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment
Case Summary: 847/2021 Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate Court in Ahmednagar acquitted respondent Ravindra Ramdas Sonawane of charges under IPC sections 279, 304(a), 337, 338, 427 and Motor Vehicles Act section 184, finding insufficient evidence that he recklessly or negligently operated the vehicle causing the fatal accident. The prosecution failed to prove the key element that the accused drove the vehicle "recklessly or negligently," with witness testimony being largely hearsay and lacking direct corroboration regarding the manner of driving. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
13-Feb-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
09-Feb-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
04-Feb-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
23-Jan-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
22-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
15-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
23-Dec-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
16-Dec-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
25-Nov-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
24-Mar-2025
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
18-Dec-2024
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
11-Jul-2024
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
24-May-2024
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
27-Feb-2024
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
22-Jan-2024
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
04-Jan-2024
Evidence
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
04-Dec-2023
Charge
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
08-Nov-2023
Charge
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
16-Sep-2023
Charge
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
26-Jul-2023
Charge
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
22-May-2023
Charge
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
01-Apr-2023
Charge
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
12-Feb-2023
Charge
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
20-Dec-2022
Charge
-
10-Oct-2022
Charge
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
16-Aug-2022
Charge
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
06-Jun-2022
Charge
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
14-Mar-2022
Charge
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
03-Jan-2022
Charge
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
26-Oct-2021
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
27-Jul-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 847/2021
Case Summary: 847/2021 Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate Court in Ahmednagar acquitted respondent Ravindra Ramdas Sonawane of charges under IPC sections 279, 304(a), 337, 338, 427 and Motor Vehicles Act section 184, finding insufficient evidence that he recklessly or negligently operated the vehicle causing the fatal accident. The prosecution failed to prove the key element that the accused drove the vehicle "recklessly or negligently," with witness testimony being largely hearsay and lacking direct corroboration regarding the manner of driving. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts