Dada Punja Gaikwad vs State through Rahata Police Station — 87/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHAH170007772026

e-Filing Number

16-03-2026

Filing Number

558/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

87/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahata

Judge

5-2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dada Punja Gaikwad

    Adv. Joshi J. A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State through Rahata Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed petitioner Dada Punja Gaikwad's application to obtain interim custody of a seized TATA vehicle (Registration No. MH-02-ER-6315) in connection with criminal case CR No. 72/2026. The court recognized Gaikwad as the legal owner and granted custody upon furnishing a ₹40 lakh indemnity bond, subject to conditions prohibiting vehicle alienation/transfer, requiring photographic documentation, preventing alterations without court permission, and mandating production before the court as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 87/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed petitioner Dada Punja Gaikwad's application to obtain interim custody of a seized TATA vehicle (Registration No. MH-02-ER-6315) in connection with criminal case CR No. 72/2026. The court recognized Gaikwad as the legal owner and granted custody upon furnishing a ₹40 lakh indemnity bond, subject to conditions prohibiting vehicle alienation/transfer, requiring photographic documentation, preventing alterations without court permission, and mandating production before the court as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case