Eshant Santosh Chaudhari vs Santosh Sampat Chaudhari — 79/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE on 30th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH170007542026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
213/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
79/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahata
Judge
2-3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Eshant Santosh Chaudhari
Adv. Chaudhari S. B.
-
2.Rutuja Santosh Chaudhari
-
3.Mirabai Sampat Chaudhari
Respondent(s)
-
1.Santosh Sampat Chaudhari
-
2.Sampat Parvat Chaudhari
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 79/2026 Summary: The court disposed of the suit as compromised between the parties on 30/04/2026. The minor plaintiff was represented by his grandmother as next friend, with court permission under CPC Order XXXII Rule 7 to enter into compromise. Both parties voluntarily agreed to settle per the signed Compromise Memo (Exh.20), which the court found lawful and beneficial to the minor. A compromise decree was ordered with court fees refunded to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
23-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
23-Apr-2026
Order
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
15-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
07-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
01-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 79/2026
Case 79/2026 Summary: The court disposed of the suit as compromised between the parties on 30/04/2026. The minor plaintiff was represented by his grandmother as next friend, with court permission under CPC Order XXXII Rule 7 to enter into compromise. Both parties voluntarily agreed to settle per the signed Compromise Memo (Exh.20), which the court found lawful and beneficial to the minor. A compromise decree was ordered with court fees refunded to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts