State through Rahata Police Station vs Sanadip Tukaram Kadam — 229/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHAH170005972026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
422/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
229/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahata
Judge
5-2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
394
Police Station
Rahata Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State through Rahata Police Station
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sanadip Tukaram Kadam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: 229/2026 The court found Sanadip Tukaram Kadam guilty under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for operating a vehicle (Tata Jeep MH-16-AY-4371) while under the influence of alcohol on October 22, 2025, near Sharada School in Rahata. The accused confessed to the charge. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹2,000 with simple imprisonment of 15 days in default of payment, and disqualified him from driving for six months under Motor Vehicles Act Section 20(1)(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-May-2026
Disposed
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
14-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
2 nd Jt- Cjjd and JMFC
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 229/2026
Case Summary: 229/2026 The court found Sanadip Tukaram Kadam guilty under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for operating a vehicle (Tata Jeep MH-16-AY-4371) while under the influence of alcohol on October 22, 2025, near Sharada School in Rahata. The accused confessed to the charge. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹2,000 with simple imprisonment of 15 days in default of payment, and disqualified him from driving for six months under Motor Vehicles Act Section 20(1)(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts