Nagar Urban Multipal Nidhi Ltd Kolhar Budruk Branch Manager Vishal Balasaheb Waditake vs Mohan Vitthalrao Sukare Advocate - NIL — 100/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 17th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHAH170002882025
e-Filing Number
27-01-2025
Filing Number
192/2025
Filing Date
28-Jan-2025
Registration No
100/2025
Registration Date
28-Jan-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahata
Judge
8-Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nagar Urban Multipal Nidhi Ltd Kolhar Budruk Branch Manager Vishal Balasaheb Waditake
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mohan Vitthalrao Sukare Advocate - NIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Rahata Judicial Magistrate First Class disposed of the case after the complainant filed a withdrawal petition (Pursis) stating that the full amount mentioned in the cheque had been received. The court granted the withdrawal, discharged the accused, and ordered refund of court fees as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
28-Nov-2025
PleaView PDF
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
06-Oct-2025
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
25-Aug-2025
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
05-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
05-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
16-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
03-May-2025
Verification
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
28-Mar-2025
Verification
Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC
-
28-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 100/2025
The Rahata Judicial Magistrate First Class disposed of the case after the complainant filed a withdrawal petition (Pursis) stating that the full amount mentioned in the cheque had been received. The court granted the withdrawal, discharged the accused, and ordered refund of court fees as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts