Joyti Raju Kathe vs Raju Shitaram Kathe — 8/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026 Date Not Updated.
PWDVA Appln.
CNR: MHAH170001812023
Filing Number
102/2023
Filing Date
27-Jan-2023
Registration No
8/2023
Registration Date
27-Jan-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahata
Judge
2-3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Joyti Raju Kathe
Adv. Sagalgile V. V.
-
2.Shirisha Raju Kathe
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raju Shitaram Kathe
-
2.Nandabai Shitaram Kathe
Adv. Meher V. N.
-
3.Gokul Shitaram Kathe
Adv. Meher V. N.
-
4.Sunil Shitaram Kathe
Adv. Meher V. N.
-
5.Puja Gokul kathe
Adv. Meher V. N.
-
6.Gorakhshnath Bhangwant Kathe
Adv. Meher V. N.
-
7.Dnyanehsor Bhagwant Kathe
Adv. Meher V. N.
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
30-Apr-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
21-Apr-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
25-Feb-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
06-Feb-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
03-Jan-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
06-Dec-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
15-Nov-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
27-Oct-2025
Order on Exhibit
Case 8/2023 Summary: The court allowed Respondent No. 1's (father's) application for visitation rights under Section 21 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The father was granted permission to meet his 6-year-old daughter Rishita for two hours on the third Saturday of every month at the Mediation Center in presence of a Protection Officer, until the main petition is decided. The court prioritized the child's welfare, holding that parental disputes should not deprive children of both parents' love and affection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Oct-2025
Order
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
24-Sep-2025
Order on Exhibit
-
24-Sep-2025
Order
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
22-Sep-2025
Order
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
26-Aug-2025
Order
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
11-Aug-2025
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
01-Jul-2025
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
12-Jun-2025
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
27-Mar-2025
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
01-Feb-2025
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
04-Jan-2025
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
30-Nov-2024
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
14-Oct-2024
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-Aug-2024
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
28-Jun-2024
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
04-Jun-2024
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
22-Apr-2024
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
22-Mar-2024
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
07-Feb-2024
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
06-Jan-2024
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
29-Nov-2023
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
01-Nov-2023
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
03-Oct-2023
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
16-Sep-2023
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
24-Aug-2023
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
27-Jul-2023
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
30-Jun-2023
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
24-May-2023
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
15-Apr-2023
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
15-Mar-2023
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
28-Feb-2023
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
01-Feb-2023
Unready Board
3rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC
-
27-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2023
Case 8/2023 Summary: The court allowed Respondent No. 1's (father's) application for visitation rights under Section 21 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The father was granted permission to meet his 6-year-old daughter Rishita for two hours on the third Saturday of every month at the Mediation Center in presence of a Protection Officer, until the main petition is decided. The court prioritized the child's welfare, holding that parental disputes should not deprive children of both parents' love and affection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts