The State of Maharashtra vs Satywan Kisan More Advocate - Pokharkar S. D. — 178/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH160013442020
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1189/2020
Filing Date
09-11-2020
Registration No
178/2020
Registration Date
09-11-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akole
Judge
1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.AKOLE
FIR Details
FIR Number
333
Police Station
AKOLE POLICE STN.AKOLE
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Satywan Kisan More Advocate - Pokharkar S. D.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.AKOLE
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal petition (Ni.Pho.Pra.Kra. 104/2020) from a First Information Report (FIR) filed under Section 313 IPC and related provisions against one Satyawan Kisan Mohre, aged 45, from Ganaore, Akole, Ahmednagar district. The Court examined multiple witnesses and documentary evidence regarding allegations related to a TruckTransporter and various charges. The petition was dismissed after the Court found insufficient evidence to proceed with the charges as formulated, and the respondent's application for stay was accordingly rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal petition (Ni.Pho.Pra.Kra. 104/2020) from a First Information Report (FIR) filed under Section 313 IPC and related provisions against one Satyawan Kisan Mohre, aged 45, from Ganaore, Akole, Ahmednagar district. The Court examined multiple witnesses and documentary evidence regarding allegations related to a TruckTransporter and various charges. The petition was dismissed after the Court found insufficient evidence to proceed with the charges as formulated, and the respondent's application for stay was accordingly rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts