The State of Maharashtra vs Narayan Mahadu Choudhari Advocate - Pokharkar S. D. — 125/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH160006722022
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
539/2022
Filing Date
10-06-2022
Registration No
125/2022
Registration Date
13-06-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akole
Judge
7-2nd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Akole
FIR Details
FIR Number
211
Police Station
AKOLE POLICE STN.AKOLE
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Narayan Mahadu Choudhari Advocate - Pokharkar S. D.
Kishor Narayan Choudhari
Priyanka Kishor Choudhari
Hearing History
Judge: 7-2nd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Akole
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: RCC 125/2022, Government v. Narayan & Others Court: First Class Magistrate Court, Akole Outcome: The case proceeded with examination of the prosecution witness (Sunita Satish Chaudhry, age 40) on 12.01.2026. The witness testified regarding a land dispute incident occurring approximately 2.5 years prior involving the accused neighbor, initially describing only minor verbal altercation but later recanting several material allegations. The court admitted her testimony; cross-examination by the defense counsel was declined, and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: RCC 125/2022, Government v. Narayan & Others Court: First Class Magistrate Court, Akole Outcome: The case proceeded with examination of the prosecution witness (Sunita Satish Chaudhry, age 40) on 12.01.2026. The witness testified regarding a land dispute incident occurring approximately 2.5 years prior involving the accused neighbor, initially describing only minor verbal altercation but later recanting several material allegations. The court admitted her testimony; cross-examination by the defense counsel was declined, and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts