Kavita Pramod Khetade vs Pramod Dayndeov Khetode Advocate - Phapale T. S. — 204/2019
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAH160006202019
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
519/2019
Filing Date
17-06-2019
Registration No
204/2019
Registration Date
17-06-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akole
Judge
7-2nd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Akole
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kavita Pramod Khetade
Adv. Hande K. B.
Respondent(s)
Pramod Dayndeov Khetode Advocate - Phapale T. S.
Dandeov Gangram Kehtade
Sunanda Dayndeov Thetade
Jyoti Dayndeov Khetade
Hearing History
Judge: 7-2nd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Akole
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 27-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 29-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by the opponent under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for permission to amend his written statement has been allowed. The court granted the opponent permission to amend his pleadings in response to amendments made by the aggrieved person following the birth of their child, finding that the opponent has the right to rebut the new facts presented. No costs were imposed on the opponent as the amendment was necessitated by the aggrieved person's own amendments to the main application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by the opponent under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for permission to amend his written statement has been allowed. The court granted the opponent permission to amend his pleadings in response to amendments made by the aggrieved person following the birth of their child, finding that the opponent has the right to rebut the new facts presented. No costs were imposed on the opponent as the amendment was necessitated by the aggrieved person's own amendments to the main application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts