The State of Maharashtra vs Sitabai Ganpat Kale — 84/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,427,201,34,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH160005402023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
424/2023
Filing Date
12-04-2023
Registration No
84/2023
Registration Date
12-04-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akole
Judge
7-2nd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Akole
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
559
Police Station
AKOLE POLICE STN.AKOLE
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sitabai Ganpat Kale
Ganpat Lahanu Kale
Vishal Ganpat Kale
Hearing History
Judge: 7-2nd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Akole
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Akole acquitted all three accused (Sitabai Ganpat Kale, Ganpat Lahanu Kale, and Vishal Ganpat Kale) of charges under IPC Sections 324, 323, 504, 506, 427, and 201 (with Section 34). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence to prove allegations of voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and wrongful restraint, despite the complainant's claims of physical assault and jewelry theft on November 29, 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Akole acquitted all three accused (Sitabai Ganpat Kale, Ganpat Lahanu Kale, and Vishal Ganpat Kale) of charges under IPC Sections 324, 323, 504, 506, 427, and 201 (with Section 34). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence to prove allegations of voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and wrongful restraint, despite the complainant's claims of physical assault and jewelry theft on November 29, 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts