The State of Maharashtra vs Sandesh Gopalkrushna Gurav Advocate - Vaidya B. G. — 81/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506,34,. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH160005282023
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
414/2023
Filing Date
05-04-2023
Registration No
81/2023
Registration Date
05-04-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akole
Judge
7-2nd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Akole
FIR Details
FIR Number
120
Police Station
AKOLE POLICE STN.AKOLE
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sandesh Gopalkrushna Gurav Advocate - Vaidya B. G.
Suman Gopalkrushn Gurav
Adv. Vaidya B. G.
Gopalkrushna Dattatray Gurv
Adv. Vaidya B. G.
Hrishikesh Gopalkrushna Gurav
Adv. Vaidya B. G.
Hearing History
Judge: 7-2nd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Akole
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a domestic violence case (RCC 81/2023) from Akole First Grade Judicial Magistrate Court. The complainant (Shital Sandesh Gurav, 32) accused her husband of cruelty, demanding dowry, beating, and forcing her out of the house in March 2021. However, during cross-examination, the complainant significantly retracted her allegations, admitting she made false statements and that the accused had not committed the acts described. The case remains under consideration with the court recording the witness's testimony and admissions of perjury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a domestic violence case (RCC 81/2023) from Akole First Grade Judicial Magistrate Court. The complainant (Shital Sandesh Gurav, 32) accused her husband of cruelty, demanding dowry, beating, and forcing her out of the house in March 2021. However, during cross-examination, the complainant significantly retracted her allegations, admitting she made false statements and that the accused had not committed the acts described. The case remains under consideration with the court recording the witness's testimony and admissions of perjury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts