The State of Maharashtra vs Madhukar Vasant Gode Advocate - Hande K. B. — 89/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354a,323,504,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH160003862021
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
321/2021
Filing Date
18-03-2021
Registration No
89/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akole
Judge
7-2nd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Akole
FIR Details
FIR Number
26
Police Station
AKOLE POLICE STN.AKOLE
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Madhukar Vasant Gode Advocate - Hande K. B.
Hearing History
Judge: 7-2nd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Akole
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary In RCC 89/2021 (State vs. Murlidhar Gode), the court recorded the examination and cross-examination of a panchnama witness (Rambhauj Deram Gode, age 77) regarding an on-site inspection conducted on 23.01.2021 at Keli Kotul-Godewadi, Akole taluka, Ahmednagar district. The witness testified that the panchnama was conducted in his presence from 10:30 AM to 11:00 AM, and he signed the document as required. The court accepted his examination testimony on 12.11.2025. This appears to be an evidentiary hearing in a criminal case with no final judgment pronounced yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In RCC 89/2021 (State vs. Murlidhar Gode), the court recorded the examination and cross-examination of a panchnama witness (Rambhauj Deram Gode, age 77) regarding an on-site inspection conducted on 23.01.2021 at Keli Kotul-Godewadi, Akole taluka, Ahmednagar district. The witness testified that the panchnama was conducted in his presence from 10:30 AM to 11:00 AM, and he signed the document as required. The court accepted his examination testimony on 12.11.2025. This appears to be an evidentiary hearing in a criminal case with no final judgment pronounced yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts