Tukaram Bhikaji Nawale vs Sarkar — 17/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAH160001802026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

135/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Akole

Judge

1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.AKOLE

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Tukaram Bhikaji Nawale

Adv. Bhosale Vinod Baban

Respondent(s)

Sarkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.AKOLE

24-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

20-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

18-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

16-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application to recover gold ornaments (1.5 tolas of gold including two bangles, chain, and eight rings) seized by Akole Police Station under FIR No. 70/2026. While the prosecution argued the items were essential evidence, the court determined the risk of deterioration and unlimited loss to the petitioner outweighed evidentiary concerns, permitting return on conditions including a bond of Rs. 2,00,000 and undertakings not to sell or alter the ornaments and produce them when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application to recover gold ornaments (1.5 tolas of gold including two bangles, chain, and eight rings) seized by Akole Police Station under FIR No. 70/2026. While the prosecution argued the items were essential evidence, the court determined the risk of deterioration and unlimited loss to the petitioner outweighed evidentiary concerns, permitting return on conditions including a bond of Rs. 2,00,000 and undertakings not to sell or alter the ornaments and produce them when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Akole All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case