Tukaram Bhikaji Nawale vs Sarkar — 17/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAH160001802026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
135/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
17/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akole
Judge
1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.AKOLE
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tukaram Bhikaji Nawale
Adv. Bhosale Vinod Baban
Respondent(s)
Sarkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.AKOLE
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 18-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 16-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application to recover gold ornaments (1.5 tolas of gold including two bangles, chain, and eight rings) seized by Akole Police Station under FIR No. 70/2026. While the prosecution argued the items were essential evidence, the court determined the risk of deterioration and unlimited loss to the petitioner outweighed evidentiary concerns, permitting return on conditions including a bond of Rs. 2,00,000 and undertakings not to sell or alter the ornaments and produce them when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application to recover gold ornaments (1.5 tolas of gold including two bangles, chain, and eight rings) seized by Akole Police Station under FIR No. 70/2026. While the prosecution argued the items were essential evidence, the court determined the risk of deterioration and unlimited loss to the petitioner outweighed evidentiary concerns, permitting return on conditions including a bond of Rs. 2,00,000 and undertakings not to sell or alter the ornaments and produce them when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts