The State of Maharashtra vs Ashitosh @ ATul Balasaheb Ugle Advocate - Kakad D. M. — 29/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH160001492022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-02-2022

Filing Number

126/2022

Filing Date

09-02-2022

Registration No

29/2022

Registration Date

09-02-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Akole

Judge

7-2nd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Akole

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

AKOLE POLICE STN.AKOLE

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 379

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Ashitosh @ ATul Balasaheb Ugle Advocate - Kakad D. M.

Hearing History

Judge: 7-2nd Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Akole

23-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

09-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

24-02-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Akole acquitted the accused Ashutosh (alias Atul Babasaheb Ugle) under IPC Section 379 (theft), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant discrepancies in the evidence regarding the tractor's registration number (varying between M.H. 17 B.Y. 7420 and M.H. 17 B.X. 4674), lack of proper documentation on who identified the accused, and witness contradictions about whether sand was actually recovered in the trailer, creating reasonable doubt favorable to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

03-02-2026
Evidence
12-03-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Akole acquitted the accused Ashutosh (alias Atul Babasaheb Ugle) under IPC Section 379 (theft), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant discrepancies in the evidence regarding the tractor's registration number (varying between M.H. 17 B.Y. 7420 and M.H. 17 B.X. 4674), lack of proper documentation on who identified the accused, and witness contradictions about whether sand was actually recovered in the trailer, creating reasonable doubt favorable to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Akole All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case