The State of Maharashtra vs Yogesh Sopan Kharat Advocate - NIL — 375/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH150019062023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1904/2023
Filing Date
27-10-2023
Registration No
375/2023
Registration Date
27-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa
Judge
2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
291
Police Station
Sonai Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Yogesh Sopan Kharat Advocate - NIL
Jyoti Yogesh Kharat
Adv. NIL
Surekha Laxman Kharat
Adv. NIL
Rukhamini @ Rakhamabai Sopan Kharat
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 06-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 12-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 28-11-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Nevasа First Class Magistrate Court acquitted all four accused under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, 506, and 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges of causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation with common intention. The court noted that while the complainant and injured witness gave testimonies, they later contradicted their earlier statements and revealed that the parties had settled their dispute amicably before trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary The Nevasа First Class Magistrate Court acquitted all four accused under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, 506, and 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges of causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation with common intention. The court noted that while the complainant and injured witness gave testimonies, they later contradicted their earlier statements and revealed that the parties had settled their dispute amicably before trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts