The State of Maharashtra vs Dipak Kailas Singh Advocate - NIL — 905/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281, 125ab, 324/4. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH150015722025

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

12th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1572/2025

Filing Date

11-07-2025

Registration No

905/2025

Registration Date

11-07-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa

Judge

1-Jt. Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa

FIR Details

FIR Number

480

Police Station

Newasa Police Station Newasa

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281, 125ab, 324/4
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 134ab, 177, 184

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Dipak Kailas Singh Advocate - NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa

25-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

09-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

16-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

27-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

06-10-2025
Plea
24-11-2025
Evidence
27-01-2026
Evidence

Court Order Summary Case: S.C.C.K. 905/2025, Nevasla First Class Court Outcome: The petition for compensation (under Section 357 CrPC) filed by Mukundrao Sakharam Thangde is ALLOWED IN PART. The court directed compensation to be awarded for the injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on 01/05/2025, while dismissing the claim for full compensation as the applicant failed to prove all allegations against the accused driver with sufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: S.C.C.K. 905/2025, Nevasla First Class Court Outcome: The petition for compensation (under Section 357 CrPC) filed by Mukundrao Sakharam Thangde is ALLOWED IN PART. The court directed compensation to be awarded for the injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on 01/05/2025, while dismissing the claim for full compensation as the applicant failed to prove all allegations against the accused driver with sufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case