The State of Maharashtra vs Rahul Gopinath Nalge Advocate - NIL — 671/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH150013312023
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1330/2023
Filing Date
28-07-2023
Registration No
671/2023
Registration Date
28-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa
Judge
2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa
FIR Details
FIR Number
321
Police Station
Newasa Police Station Newasa
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rahul Gopinath Nalge Advocate - NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 05-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The witness (Saurabh Fulkar, aged 22) in this motor vehicle accident case (Case No. 671/2023) gave contradictory testimony regarding an accident involving a motorcycle and tempo. The court found the witness's statements inconsistent and granted permission for cross-examination under Indian Evidence Act Section 154. The cross-examination by the accused's counsel was declined, and the court accepted the witness testimony after hearing, noting discrepancies in the witness's account of the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The witness (Saurabh Fulkar, aged 22) in this motor vehicle accident case (Case No. 671/2023) gave contradictory testimony regarding an accident involving a motorcycle and tempo. The court found the witness's statements inconsistent and granted permission for cross-examination under Indian Evidence Act Section 154. The cross-examination by the accused's counsel was declined, and the court accepted the witness testimony after hearing, noting discrepancies in the witness's account of the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts