The State of Maharashtra vs Sagar Bharat Gaikwad Advocate - NIL — 660/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH150011672024

Filing Number

1167/2024

Filing Date

06-Jul-2024

Registration No

660/2024

Registration Date

06-Jul-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa

Judge

1-Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1203

Police Station

Newasa Police Station Newasa

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sagar Bharat Gaikwad Advocate - NIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged the accused from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the CrPC, citing the accused's absence, non-filing of the Competent Authority report, and the Bombay High Court's special drive directive for case disposal. The seized property was ordered to be transferred to the Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

  6. 08-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

  7. 04-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

  8. 20-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

  9. 30-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

  10. 20-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 06-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 660/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the CrPC, citing the accused's absence, non-filing of the Competent Authority report, and the Bombay High Court's special drive directive for case disposal. The seized property was ordered to be transferred to the Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case