The State of Maharashtra vs Balasaheb Kakaji Bramhane Advocate - Nahar P. C. — 567/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)(f). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH150010242024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1024/2024
Filing Date
24-06-2024
Registration No
567/2024
Registration Date
24-06-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa
Judge
9-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.,Newasa
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0197
Police Station
Sonai Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Balasaheb Kakaji Bramhane Advocate - Nahar P. C.
Hearing History
Judge: 9-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.,Newasa
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 06-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Nevasa Court (Ahmednagar district) acquitted the accused of illegal liquor manufacturing and sales charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act. The court found that while police recovered illicit liquor materials, the prosecution failed to establish through independent witnesses that the contraband was in the accused's possession, creating reasonable doubt about the seizure. The court consequently granted the accused acquittal under CrPC Section 258 and ordered release of the accused's bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Nevasa Court (Ahmednagar district) acquitted the accused of illegal liquor manufacturing and sales charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act. The court found that while police recovered illicit liquor materials, the prosecution failed to establish through independent witnesses that the contraband was in the accused's possession, creating reasonable doubt about the seizure. The court consequently granted the accused acquittal under CrPC Section 258 and ordered release of the accused's bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts