Savita Raosaheb Aher vs Raosaheb Babasaheb Aher Advocate - Murdare Amol V. — 41/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 18,19,20,21,23. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHAH150010232022
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1023/2022
Filing Date
23-06-2022
Registration No
41/2022
Registration Date
23-06-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Savita Raosaheb Aher
Adv. Makone S. P.
Sudarshan Raosaheb Aher
Adv. NIL
Respondent(s)
Raosaheb Babasaheb Aher Advocate - Murdare Amol V.
Babasaheb Punjaba Aher
Adv. NIL
Mandabai Babasaheb Aher
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Dismissed (Complete Relief Denied) The court dismissed the petitioner's petition completely, finding her claims and contentions to be false and unsubstantiated. The court rejected the petitioner's allegations against the respondent regarding maintenance, harassment, property rights, and other family matters, noting inconsistencies in her statements and lack of documentary evidence. The order concludes that the petition was filed without genuine grounds and dismisses it entirely without granting any relief to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Dismissed (Complete Relief Denied) The court dismissed the petitioner's petition completely, finding her claims and contentions to be false and unsubstantiated. The court rejected the petitioner's allegations against the respondent regarding maintenance, harassment, property rights, and other family matters, noting inconsistencies in her statements and lack of documentary evidence. The order concludes that the petition was filed without genuine grounds and dismisses it entirely without granting any relief to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts