Bhausaheb Sopan Sonawane vs M/s Pranav Enterprises Advocate - NIL — 134/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,418,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 02nd April 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH150006762023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

675/2023

Filing Date

15-04-2023

Registration No

134/2023

Registration Date

18-04-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa

Judge

2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 406,418,34

Petitioner(s)

Bhausaheb Sopan Sonawane

Adv. Wagh N. T.

Respondent(s)

M/s Pranav Enterprises Advocate - NIL

Subhash Ramrao Wabale

Adv. NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa

02-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Dismissal Order

27-01-2026

Dismissal Order

09-12-2025

Dismissal Order

09-10-2025

Dismissal Order

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Newasa Judicial Magistrate First Class disposed of R.C.C. No. 134/2023 (Bhausaheb Sopan Sonwane v. M/s. Pranav Enterprises & Others) by stopping proceedings and discharging the accused under Bombay High Court's special drive directive. The case, involving offences under IPC sections 409, 405, 406, 418, 463-467, 477(c), had remained stalled for over two years due to continuous absence of the complainant and advocate despite pending summons, making further adjournment futile. Case papers were retained in 'C' file for potential reopening under CrPC Section 300(5). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Newasa Judicial Magistrate First Class disposed of R.C.C. No. 134/2023 (Bhausaheb Sopan Sonwane v. M/s. Pranav Enterprises & Others) by stopping proceedings and discharging the accused under Bombay High Court's special drive directive. The case, involving offences under IPC sections 409, 405, 406, 418, 463-467, 477(c), had remained stalled for over two years due to continuous absence of the complainant and advocate despite pending summons, making further adjournment futile. Case papers were retained in 'C' file for potential reopening under CrPC Section 300(5). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case