The State of Maharashtra vs Sagar Kadubhau Sonawane Advocate - NIL — 150/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323, 324, 504, 506, 34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH150005972022
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
597/2022
Filing Date
31-03-2022
Registration No
150/2022
Registration Date
31-03-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa
Judge
9-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.,Newasa
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
Shani Shingnapur Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sagar Kadubhau Sonawane Advocate - NIL
Sarita Sagar Sonawane
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 9-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.,Newasa
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 14-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition, not a court order with a final judgment. It records the testimony of Dr. Santosh Aapasaheb Markad (Witness No. 9 for the State) in case R.C.C. No.150/2022, where he examined two assault victims on 19/02/2022 and documented their injuries. The doctor testified that both Dadasaheb Sonawane and Swati sustained fresh, simple injuries consistent with hard and blunt object impact, and issued medical certificates; during cross-examination, the defense suggested injuries could result from a motorcycle fall, but the doctor maintained his findings were accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition, not a court order with a final judgment. It records the testimony of Dr. Santosh Aapasaheb Markad (Witness No. 9 for the State) in case R.C.C. No.150/2022, where he examined two assault victims on 19/02/2022 and documented their injuries. The doctor testified that both Dadasaheb Sonawane and Swati sustained fresh, simple injuries consistent with hard and blunt object impact, and issued medical certificates; during cross-examination, the defense suggested injuries could result from a motorcycle fall, but the doctor maintained his findings were accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts