Rajendra Ashruba Chitale vs Government of Maharashtra Advocate - APP — 47/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th March 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHAH150003692026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
369/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
47/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa
Judge
2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
111
Police Station
Newasa Police Station Newasa
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendra Ashruba Chitale
Adv. Lawande S. B.
Respondent(s)
Government of Maharashtra Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 05-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 02-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 24-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted the applicant's request for interim custody of his seized Suzuki Super Carry CNG vehicle, finding that retaining it at the police station serves no purpose and risks deterioration. The vehicle was released on a ₹5,00,000 bond with conditions that the applicant cannot dispose of it and must produce it as required, while the investigating officer must document it through photographs and panchnama before handover. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted the applicant's request for interim custody of his seized Suzuki Super Carry CNG vehicle, finding that retaining it at the police station serves no purpose and risks deterioration. The vehicle was released on a ₹5,00,000 bond with conditions that the applicant cannot dispose of it and must produce it as required, while the investigating officer must document it through photographs and panchnama before handover. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts