Rajendra Ashruba Chitale vs Government of Maharashtra Advocate - APP — 47/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th March 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHAH150003692026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
369/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
47/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa
Judge
2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
111
Police Station
Newasa Police Station Newasa
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajendra Ashruba Chitale
Adv. Lawande S. B.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Maharashtra Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted the applicant's request for interim custody of his seized Suzuki Super Carry CNG vehicle, finding that retaining it at the police station serves no purpose and risks deterioration. The vehicle was released on a ₹5,00,000 bond with conditions that the applicant cannot dispose of it and must produce it as required, while the investigating officer must document it through photographs and panchnama before handover. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa
-
06-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa
-
05-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa
-
02-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 47/2026
The court granted the applicant's request for interim custody of his seized Suzuki Super Carry CNG vehicle, finding that retaining it at the police station serves no purpose and risks deterioration. The vehicle was released on a ₹5,00,000 bond with conditions that the applicant cannot dispose of it and must produce it as required, while the investigating officer must document it through photographs and panchnama before handover. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts