The State of Maharashtra vs Balasaheb Or Baliram Dattatraya Naik Advocate - NIL — 55/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326, 324, 323, 504, 506 ,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH150003012025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

301/2025

Filing Date

17-02-2025

Registration No

55/2025

Registration Date

17-02-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa

Judge

2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

382

Police Station

Newasa Police Station Newasa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 326, 324, 323, 504, 506 ,34

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Balasaheb Or Baliram Dattatraya Naik Advocate - NIL

Adinath Balasaheb @ Baliram Naik

Adv. NIL

Shubham Trimbak Naik

Adv. NIL

Sunita Balasaheb @ Baliram Naik

Adv. NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa

18-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

N.B.W._Ready

05-02-2026

N.B.W._Ready

29-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

20-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court acquitted all four accused of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 326, 323, 504, 506, and 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged assault with an iron rod and beatings. The court noted that the complainant's testimony was inconsistent with his written complaint and that the accused and complainant subsequently settled their dispute amicably, undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

07-01-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted all four accused of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 326, 323, 504, 506, and 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged assault with an iron rod and beatings. The court noted that the complainant's testimony was inconsistent with his written complaint and that the accused and complainant subsequently settled their dispute amicably, undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case