The State of Maharashtra vs Sopan Vinayak Khandare Advocate - NIL — 152/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH150002392025

Filing Number

239/2025

Filing Date

07-Feb-2025

Registration No

152/2025

Registration Date

07-Feb-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa

Judge

2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

917

Police Station

Newasa Police Station Newasa

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sopan Vinayak Khandare Advocate - NIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Newasa Court discharged accused Sopan Vinayak Khandare and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC in a Bombay Prohibition Act case because the prosecution failed to file the mandatory chemical analyzer report despite repeated opportunities, rendering the case unprovable. The seized materials were ordered disposed by the Excise Department, with case papers retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

  5. 12-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

  6. 22-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

  7. 04-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jd JMFC Newasa

  8. 14-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 07-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 152/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Newasa Court discharged accused Sopan Vinayak Khandare and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC in a Bombay Prohibition Act case because the prosecution failed to file the mandatory chemical analyzer report despite repeated opportunities, rendering the case unprovable. The seized materials were ordered disposed by the Excise Department, with case papers retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case