The State of Maharashtra vs Vikram Rambhau Rindhe Advocate - NIL — 49/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324, 323, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH150001892023
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
189/2023
Filing Date
06-02-2023
Registration No
49/2023
Registration Date
06-02-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa
Judge
3-4th Jt. CJJD and JMFC,Newasa
FIR Details
FIR Number
145
Police Station
Shani Shingnapur Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vikram Rambhau Rindhe Advocate - NIL
Sonali Shivaji Ghule
Adv. NIL
Archana Dnyandeo Timkare
Adv. NIL
Sanita Mukund Mokate
Adv. NIL
Ashvini Dnyandeo Kurhat
Adv. NIL
Mandabai Balasaheb Korde
Adv. NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-4th Jt. CJJD and JMFC,Newasa
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary The court examined medical evidence (Exhibits 58 and 59) documenting injuries sustained by the complainant on 14.11.2022, and after detailed analysis of the wounds and medical certificates, found the injuries to be fresh and simple in nature. The petition is dismissed as the court determined the medical evidence does not support the severity of injuries alleged, and the case does not warrant the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court examined medical evidence (Exhibits 58 and 59) documenting injuries sustained by the complainant on 14.11.2022, and after detailed analysis of the wounds and medical certificates, found the injuries to be fresh and simple in nature. The petition is dismissed as the court determined the medical evidence does not support the severity of injuries alleged, and the case does not warrant the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts