State Bank of India Branch Newasa through Ranjit Shivaji Nale vs Vinayak Dnyandev Yadav Advocate - NIL — 18/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH150000292025
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2025
Filing Number
29/2025
Filing Date
06-01-2025
Registration No
18/2025
Registration Date
07-01-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa
Judge
2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank of India Branch Newasa through Ranjit Shivaji Nale
Adv. Makone P. R.
Respondent(s)
Vinayak Dnyandev Yadav Advocate - NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 18-08-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary The court (2nd Joint JMFC, Newasa) dismissed the criminal case against the accused (a 41-year-old bank official charged with misappropriation). The accused was found to have fraudulently withdrawn ₹1,40,000 from a bank account but later deposited ₹95,176 back, and the cheque mentioned by the prosecution lacked sufficient funds. Under IPC Section 138, the court found the evidence insufficient to prove the charges and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court (2nd Joint JMFC, Newasa) dismissed the criminal case against the accused (a 41-year-old bank official charged with misappropriation). The accused was found to have fraudulently withdrawn ₹1,40,000 from a bank account but later deposited ₹95,176 back, and the cheque mentioned by the prosecution lacked sufficient funds. Under IPC Section 138, the court found the evidence insufficient to prove the charges and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts