State Bank of India Branch Newasa through Ranjit Shivaji Nale vs Vinayak Dnyandev Yadav Advocate - NIL — 18/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH150000292025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

e-Filing Number

06-01-2025

Filing Number

29/2025

Filing Date

06-01-2025

Registration No

18/2025

Registration Date

07-01-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa

Judge

2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

State Bank of India Branch Newasa through Ranjit Shivaji Nale

Adv. Makone P. R.

Respondent(s)

Vinayak Dnyandev Yadav Advocate - NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge JD JMFC Newasa

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-12-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-10-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

18-08-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

14-01-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court (2nd Joint JMFC, Newasa) dismissed the criminal case against the accused (a 41-year-old bank official charged with misappropriation). The accused was found to have fraudulently withdrawn ₹1,40,000 from a bank account but later deposited ₹95,176 back, and the cheque mentioned by the prosecution lacked sufficient funds. Under IPC Section 138, the court found the evidence insufficient to prove the charges and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court (2nd Joint JMFC, Newasa) dismissed the criminal case against the accused (a 41-year-old bank official charged with misappropriation). The accused was found to have fraudulently withdrawn ₹1,40,000 from a bank account but later deposited ₹95,176 back, and the cheque mentioned by the prosecution lacked sufficient funds. Under IPC Section 138, the court found the evidence insufficient to prove the charges and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Newasa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case