Sakharam Muktaji Argade Dead L.H. Bhagwan Sakharam Argade vs Dhondabai Bansi Argade — 66/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 09th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAH140015642020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1481/2020
Filing Date
04-12-2020
Registration No
66/2020
Registration Date
05-12-2020
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa
Judge
3-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Newasa
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sakharam Muktaji Argade Dead L.H. Bhagwan Sakharam Argade
Adv. Najan J. R.
Raosaheb Sakharam Argade
Abasaheb Sakharam Argade
Latabai Raosaheb Nabde
Janabai Nivrutti Argade
Nirmala Chandrabhan dhepe
Pradeep Nivrutti Argade
Asarabai Sakharam Argade
Respondent(s)
Dhondabai Bansi Argade
Eknath Radhaji Argade
machchhindra Radhaji Argade
Ashok RAdhaji Argade
Babanbai Annasaheb karle
Chhabanbai Dattatraya Kale
Mandabai Ambadas Game
Kalabai Radhaji Argade (dead) L.H. Def. No. 2 to 7
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Newasa
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 05-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 29-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Nevasā Civil Court rejected the applicants' petition seeking to restore a civil miscellaneous application (CMA 19/2010) that was dismissed on 19 January 2019 due to the applicant's failure to appear. The court found the applicants' delay of over one year and ten months in filing the restoration petition unjustified, as they failed to provide satisfactory reasons for each day of delay or supporting documentation, despite having adequate knowledge of the original case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Nevasā Civil Court rejected the applicants' petition seeking to restore a civil miscellaneous application (CMA 19/2010) that was dismissed on 19 January 2019 due to the applicant's failure to appear. The court found the applicants' delay of over one year and ten months in filing the restoration petition unjustified, as they failed to provide satisfactory reasons for each day of delay or supporting documentation, despite having adequate knowledge of the original case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts