Rekha alias Kusumbai Namdev Gore vs Chhaya Sitaram Ghorpade — 1015/2023

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 6. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH140014252023

e-Filing Number

05-10-2023

Filing Number

1377/2023

Filing Date

12-Oct-2023

Registration No

1015/2023

Registration Date

18-Oct-2023

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa

Judge

3-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 6
Specific Relief Act Section 38,39,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rekha alias Kusumbai Namdev Gore

    Adv. Pathan Mosinkhan M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chhaya Sitaram Ghorpade

  2. 2.Alka Ram Karale

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    List of Witness

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  5. 14-Jan-2026

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  6. 29-Nov-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 1015/2023 Outcome: Temporary injunction application ALLOWED. The court granted the plaintiff's request for a temporary injunction restraining defendants from obstructing her possession of disputed agricultural property or creating third-party interests through transfer. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case as a legal heir to her deceased husband's ancestral property, balance of convenience favored her, and she faced irreparable loss without protection. The injunction remains in effect until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 29-Nov-2025

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  8. 24-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  9. 20-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  13. 04-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  14. 08-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  15. 18-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  16. 03-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  17. 17-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  18. 24-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  19. 10-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 10-Mar-2025

    Compliance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  21. 27-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  22. 23-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  23. 19-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  24. 19-Nov-2024

    Compliance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  25. 11-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  26. 09-Aug-2024

    Steps

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  27. 20-Jun-2024

    Steps

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  28. 20-Mar-2024

    Steps

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  29. 06-Feb-2024

    Report

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  30. 07-Dec-2023

    Report

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  31. 21-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 12-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1015/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 1015/2023 Outcome: Temporary injunction application ALLOWED. The court granted the plaintiff's request for a temporary injunction restraining defendants from obstructing her possession of disputed agricultural property or creating third-party interests through transfer. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case as a legal heir to her deceased husband's ancestral property, balance of convenience favored her, and she faced irreparable loss without protection. The injunction remains in effect until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case