Javed Mahebub Shaikh vs Nasim Javed Shaikh — 515/2025
Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH140008652025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
19-06-2025
Filing Number
921/2025
Filing Date
20-06-2025
Registration No
515/2025
Registration Date
20-06-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Javed Mahebub Shaikh
Adv. JADHAV MAHESH HARIBHAU
Respondent(s)
Nasim Javed Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing Without W.S.
Hearing Without W.S.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 19-11-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. | |
| 13-10-2025 | Hearing Without W.S. |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The court dismissed the petition filed by the accused challenging the marriage registration. The court found that the marriage between the petitioner (male, age 24) and respondent (female) was valid and legally solemnized according to Muslim law on 28/04/2005 in Ahmednagar district. The court rejected the petitioner's claims that the marriage was invalid or that he was deceived, holding that the evidence and circumstances supported the legitimacy of the marriage. Consequently, the petitioner's plea to declare the marriage void was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The court dismissed the petition filed by the accused challenging the marriage registration. The court found that the marriage between the petitioner (male, age 24) and respondent (female) was valid and legally solemnized according to Muslim law on 28/04/2005 in Ahmednagar district. The court rejected the petitioner's claims that the marriage was invalid or that he was deceived, holding that the evidence and circumstances supported the legitimacy of the marriage. Consequently, the petitioner's plea to declare the marriage void was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts