Javed Mahebub Shaikh vs Nasim Javed Shaikh — 515/2025

Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH140008652025

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

22nd April 2026

e-Filing Number

19-06-2025

Filing Number

921/2025

Filing Date

20-06-2025

Registration No

515/2025

Registration Date

20-06-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34
Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act Section 2(9)

Petitioner(s)

Javed Mahebub Shaikh

Adv. JADHAV MAHESH HARIBHAU

Respondent(s)

Nasim Javed Shaikh

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

09-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

11-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

05-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

19-11-2025

Hearing Without W.S.

13-10-2025

Hearing Without W.S.

Interim Orders

05-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

Court Order Summary The court dismissed the petition filed by the accused challenging the marriage registration. The court found that the marriage between the petitioner (male, age 24) and respondent (female) was valid and legally solemnized according to Muslim law on 28/04/2005 in Ahmednagar district. The court rejected the petitioner's claims that the marriage was invalid or that he was deceived, holding that the evidence and circumstances supported the legitimacy of the marriage. Consequently, the petitioner's plea to declare the marriage void was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary The court dismissed the petition filed by the accused challenging the marriage registration. The court found that the marriage between the petitioner (male, age 24) and respondent (female) was valid and legally solemnized according to Muslim law on 28/04/2005 in Ahmednagar district. The court rejected the petitioner's claims that the marriage was invalid or that he was deceived, holding that the evidence and circumstances supported the legitimacy of the marriage. Consequently, the petitioner's plea to declare the marriage void was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case